Monday, July 30, 2018

Humanae Vitae: Prophecy fulfilled


Humanae Vitae was a prophetic document when it was published 50 years ago.  I give you Paragraph 17:

Responsible men can become more deeply convinced of the truth of the doctrine laid down by the Church on this issue if they reflect on the consequences of methods and plans for artificial birth control. Let them first consider how easily this course of action could open wide the way for marital infidelity and a general lowering of moral standards. Not much experience is needed to be fully aware of human weakness and to understand that human beings—and especially the young, who are so exposed to temptation—need incentives to keep the moral law, and it is an evil thing to make it easy for them to break that law. Another effect that gives cause for alarm is that a man who grows accustomed to the use of contraceptive methods may forget the reverence due to a woman, and, disregarding her physical and emotional equilibrium, reduce her to being a mere instrument for the satisfaction of his own desires, no longer considering her as his partner whom he should surround with care and affection.

Finally, careful consideration should be given to the danger of this power passing into the hands of those public authorities who care little for the precepts of the moral law. Who will blame a government which in its attempt to resolve the problems affecting an entire country resorts to the same measures as are regarded as lawful by married people in the solution of a particular family difficulty? Who will prevent public authorities from favoring those contraceptive methods which they consider more effective? Should they regard this as necessary, they may even impose their use on everyone. It could well happen, therefore, that when people, either individually or in family or social life, experience the inherent difficulties of the divine law and are determined to avoid them, they may give into the hands of public authorities the power to intervene in the most personal and intimate responsibility of husband and wife.

Consequently, unless we are willing that the responsibility of procreating life should be left to the arbitrary decision of men, we must accept that there are certain limits, beyond which it is wrong to go, to the power of man over his own body and its natural functions—limits, let it be said, which no one, whether as a private individual or as a public authority, can lawfully exceed. These limits are expressly imposed because of the reverence due to the whole human organism and its natural functions, in the light of the principles we stated earlier, and in accordance with a correct understanding of the "principle of totality" enunciated by Our predecessor Pope Pius XII.


Infidelity   I think it is obvious that more people are getting divorced today than they did back when birth control first began to become legal in the middle of the last century.

Lack of reverence for women   There has definitely been an increase in reports of sexual abuse and sexual assault since legal birth control came about.   The aforementioned infidelity is another sign of disrespect for women when the man leaves his wife, which happens more frequently now.

Abuse of power  There has definitely been an  increase, especially in the later part of the 20th century, in government enforced limits on number of children, which utilizes enforced abortion, and sterilization to achieve its ends.  (See my series on population control entitled “Be Fruitful and Multiply” for more information, especially this section here: 


Unlimited Dominion   We now think we can do whatever we want with our bodies; this includes abort the child inside it, end its vitality whenever we want (euthanasia)  alter it to change our gender, sterilize, drug it up, the list goes on.  There are dangers when man thinks there are no limits to what he or she can do with his or her body.

We no longer realize our bodies, and that includes our reproductive organs, are gifts from God and that we are called to be good stewards of them.  Let us heed the warnings of Pope Paul VI, and see our bodies as they truly are “temples of the Holy Spirit.” (1 Corinthians 6:19).  (For more on the glorious creation that is our body, see my post here:



This encyclical was truly prophetic.  But as I stated in the first post in this series, it possibly could have been a richer document.  There is a slight chance it may have been received differently than it was if it had been supplemented with more appeals to Scripture and Tradition.   I will discuss that in a little more detail in the last post of this series.



Wednesday, July 25, 2018

Why contraception is wrong, Part Two

Last night, I listed several reasons why contraception is wrong.  The last I listed was:
Contraception leads to abortion.   

Let’s expand on that a little tonight.*

When one contracepts, one wishes to enjoy the sexual act without all the responsibility that comes with it.  If the contraception fails, then the child is not seen as a gift from God, but rather as an inconvenience, or even a “failure”.  If the contraception fails, which it often does, what is the only way to ensure its failure is not final?  The answer is abortion, the ultimate form of birth control. 
A misguided notion today is that using contraception should lead to fewer abortions.   The more contraception is used, however, the more sexually active people are, and therefore, the more contraceptive failures there will be, and so, therefore, there will be more “need” of abortion as a backup plan.   
Some forms of contraception are actually what are called abortifacients.  Abortifacients do the same thing as medically induced abortions do; they end the life of a fully realized human person.  Some, like IUD, prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus.  (When an egg is fertilized, that is conception and this when human life begins.)   Some, like RU 486, actually abort an intact fetus inside the woman’s body.   So, really, if we wish to speak about abortion, we have to talk about all forms, including ones fostered by various forms of contraceptives.
The sexual revolution, which was in full force when Humanae Vitae was published, was about having sex more openly and freely and frequently, and the effects remain today. It was about the pleasures of sex, not about its meaning and purpose. Because it was about pleasure, it was definitely not about babies.  To have sex openly, freely, and frequently, and exclude babies, contraception was deemed necessary.   If there were no contraceptives, there would have been no sexual revolution.  And of course, as we stated, when the contraceptives failed, abortion had to become the fall back option, and therefore, it had to be made accessible to all.
This revolution taught that we, not God, were the masters of sex.   The sexual revolution stated we could have sex whenever we wanted.  It was disassociated with love and responsibility.   It became “casual” or “recreational”.   The deep meaning of sex, ingrained by the Creator, was lost.  No longer was sex a result, or a deepening, of true love, but rather, sex was used to try to create love, or maybe not even love, but maybe some kind of high feeling, like a drug.  That is not what sex was designed for.
Sex, untethered to morality, leads to consequences, which the Holy Father predicted in Humane Vitae, and which I listed briefly in the first post in this series.  I will discuss them in a little more detail in the next post. 
*This material is drawn mostly from my post on this connection between abortion and contraception in October of 2016.


Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Why contraception is wrong, Part One


If someone asks me why contraception is wrong, here is what I would say*. 
1)      If you break the word down, it means "against conception" (contra- ‘against’ + a shortened form of conception.).  So, the act is against conception.  Well, there is the first clue God would not approve of it.   It is against something He created, the act of conception.  
2)      How do human beings come into the world?   They do through conception.  Therefore, conception is a good thing because human beings come into the world through it.   Without conception, there is no birth, no baby, no beautiful child, and correspondingly, no further children.  Something that goes against all that cannot be a good thing.
3)      We often hear the phrase "actions speak louder than words".   We speak more than with just words.  Saint John Paul II spoke of the "nuptial meaning of the body".   Through all the actions of our body, we speak something.  When we use contraception in the midst of the conjugal act, what are we saying?  We are saying we love the other person, but not with our whole selves.  Is this really the love we want to show the other person, especially in such a deep and profoundly intimate moment?  By using contraception, we indeed make it look like we are giving our whole selves to the other, but we really are not.  Contraception makes us liars.   God, who is truth, does not lie, and we who are created in his image, are made for truth, not for falsehood.  Therefore, in addition to going against the good, it goes against truth, and that is another reason why God would not approve of contraception.
4)      Close to the beginning of the Bible, God says "Be fruitful and multiply.  Fill the earth and subdue it." (Genesis 1:28).  God wants to fill the earth with people made in his image!   Contraception specifically, and all forms of population control in general, goes directly against this wish of God's.  There are serious affects when we lower birth rates which I discussed in detail in my series entitled “Be Fruitful and Multiply”, specifically Part Three:  http://jimscatholicblog.blogspot.com/2017/04/be-fruitful-and-multiply-part-three_2.html
5)      It is wrong because the supreme moral authority in the world, the Catholic Church, says so.  Let us read the exact words of the Catechism on this matter, which quotes Humane Vitae.  "Every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible" is intrinsically evil." (p.2370) When we introduce something to thwart fecundity, into an act that is designed by God to promote fecundity, we do wrong.  
6)      Contraception leads to abortion.  This will be the topic of the next post.
*much of this material comes from a previous post on contraception I did in 2016:

The good and bad of Humanae Vitae at 50

This coming Wednesday, July 25, marks the 50th anniversary of the publication of the encyclical Humanae Vitae by Pope Paul VI. (And I just realized now for the first time that this encyclical came out just a little over a week before my parents got married; I had never realized that before!)
Probably more people inside and outside the Church have heard of this encyclical than any other papal encyclical in modern times because it discusses such a controversial topic, contraception. Everyone has an opinion on it.
Again, much will be written about it in Catholic media about it this week, and one can find a wealth of information. I will just say a few things:
From where I stand, the encyclical has more good than bad, but both need to be discussed.
The good is that it came to the right conclusion, using artificial birth control is not a morally right decision. Its predictions what would happen with increased use of it have largely come true: increased divorce, infidelity, abortions, sterilization programs, and loss of respect for women have all occurred since then.
There is some bad though.
First, is it is generally agreed that it could’ve been a better written document, with more references to Scripture and Tradition, as well as more references to the theology of the entire body, not just the sexual act. (Would things be different if John Paul II had written it instead of Paul VI? A case could be made for that.)
Another bad, which I just learned today, was that there was a three year gap between the end of the commission to study the issue, and the time the encyclical was published. It certainly didn’t come across as decisive with that amount of time passed.
Finally, the worse bad of them all it that has been largely been a failure, more Catholics are practicing birth control now than ever before. ( Maybe it didn’t stand a chance being published at the height of the sexual revolution in 1968? Who knows? )
So while it has been proved prophetic, it has not necessarily been proven successful.
All these things should make rich topics of conversation this week in the Church, and hopefully we all can do some reflection this week on this issue. To that end, I most likely will publish a few more things about this issue throughout this week, so stay tuned!