In this final post in this series on the Church and science,
we will look at a few challenges that exist with the Holy Father’s encyclical
on the environment, Laudato Si.
Overall, as we hopefully have showed, there is much more
positive than negative to the document.
It has a goal, and I hope it is achieved, of bringing the human person back to the center of the
discussion in the environment. Social
life has an impact on the environment, and vice versa. There is just not a world of nature “out
there”; there is an internal nature to men and women that needs to factor into
discussion of the natural world. His
critique of consumerism and the rapid pace of modern life is certainly worthy
of prayerful reflection, as well as his raising attention to some of the
negative features of the technological age.
His affirmation of Catholic teaching against forms of population control,
and also maintaining the unique dignity of each of the sexes, is noteworthy in
an encyclical on the environment. He
points out that other issues, such as resource inequality, are causes of the
problems more so than there being too many people in the world. His perusing of various places in Scripture
and Tradition where positive references to the natural world are made, showing
it is a gift from God that we must treasure, as well as showing how different
doctrines of the Church like the Trinity and the Sacraments also point to, or
at least imply, a positive relationship with the environment, are all positive
contributions to the current discussion on the environment.
The main issue with the encyclical, as I see it is as
follows. The Church’s competence is in
the area of faith and morals, and a
fair amount of this encyclical falls outside
that realm, in the realm of science, which is not proper to the Church’s authoritative teaching. Like
we have seen, the Church has a great respect for science. Many of her members are and have been renowned
scientists. Popes have spoken very highly
of scientific endeavors. However, the
Church does not have the authority, in its Magisterial office, to speak authoritatively
on matters of science. This is where I fear this encyclical may cross a line.
Few will say that the Pope invoked infallibility here, which
he clearly did not. However, as
Catholics, we are called to religious assent, even in non-infallible
teachings. The Catechism states this
clearly in paragraph 822 Divine
assistance is also given to the successors of the apostles, teaching in
communion with the successor of Peter, and, in a particular way, to the bishop
of Rome, pastor of the whole Church, when, without arriving at an infallible
definition and without pronouncing in a "definitive manner," they
propose in the exercise of the ordinary Magisterium a teaching that leads to
better understanding of Revelation in matters of faith and morals. To this
ordinary teaching the faithful "are to adhere to it with religious
assent" which, though distinct from the assent of faith, is nonetheless an
extension of it. I fear that some
who read this document will not realize that in matters of science, religious assent
is not required. They may feel they have to because this is,
after all, a papal encyclical, assent to everything that is said in there. I do not believe that that is the case. This assent is only required in areas of faith
and morals, as is clearly outlined in this quote from the Catechism.
What are some areas where
disagreement may occur? The one that
sticks out probably all else is the issue of climate change, which the Holy Father discusses in paragraphs
23-26. Here are some standout quotes: A very solid scientific consensus indicates
that we are presently witnessing a disturbing warming of the climatic system…It
is true that there are other factors (such as volcanic activity, variations in
the earth’s orbit and axis, the solar cycle), yet a number of scientific
studies indicate that most global warming in recent decades is due to the great
concentration of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen oxides and
others) released mainly as a result of human activity… Warming has effects on the carbon cycle. It creates a
vicious circle which aggravates the situation even more, affecting the
availability of essential resources like drinking water, energy and
agricultural production in warmer regions, and leading to the extinction of
part of the planet’s biodiversity. The melting in the polar ice caps and in
high altitude plains can lead to the dangerous release of methane gas, while
the decomposition of frozen organic material can further increase the emission
of carbon dioxide. Things are made worse by the loss of tropical forests which
would otherwise help to mitigate climate change. Carbon dioxide pollution
increases the acidification of the oceans and compromises the marine food
chain. If present trends continue, this century may well witness extraordinary
climate change and an unprecedented destruction of ecosystems, with serious
consequences for all of us.
The Holy Father is stating what
he deems facts on science here, not faith and morals. Therefore, because he is not speaking here on faith
or morals, these words, while they demand respect and consideration, do not
require the level of religious assent that is typical in Magisterial teaching.
Certainly, the vast majority of
people in the scientific field agree climate change is occurring. A smaller majority, however, would agree that
that this change is properly termed “warming”.
And even a smaller majority would
posit that this climate change, or global warming, is caused by man. There is not consensus in the scientific
community on this issue, especially on the question of whether the change is caused
by human activity. This encyclical does
not give credence to the dissenting opinions.
I myself have a hard time believing in “man made” global warming. I believe the climate is changing, but it is
always changing, as it has for the billions of years it has existed, and that
that change is caused more by natural process, that have existed for centuries
and centuries, than an by anything a generation or two does or does not do on
their short stays on this planet.
The other major issue many could
find with this encyclical was its positing government as the primary solution
to the environmental problems rather than the free market. The Holy Father speaks in several areas about
the positive value of politics, but rarely does he speak about the positive aspects
of business. Yes, there are ruthless businessmen
who will do anything for profits, but at their best, businessmen want to make
money, and be sustainable for years to come, and to do so, it would be logical
to think that they would want to be environmentally and morally friendly.
However, in this encyclical, the
Holy Father tends to speak about only the positives about political, and not
the negative, while doing the reverse about free market business solutions. This quote is noteworthy: Society,
through non-governmental organizations and intermediate groups, must put
pressure on governments to develop more rigorous regulations, procedures and
controls. Unless citizens control political power – national, regional and
municipal – it will not be possible to control damage to the environment. This
seems very alarmist and does not seem to respect the great power of the
individual and smaller communities to make an impact in the world in their
private lives. Here is another
noteworthy quote; A healthy politics is sorely needed, capable of reforming and
coordinating institutions, promoting best practices and overcoming undue
pressure and bureaucratic inertia. The
Church has for a long time spoken highly of societal institutions like the
family and school; quotes like this seem to reflect not having much faith in
them, and that they need political/ government intrusion to function properly.
This encyclical, in my opinion, lacks
the balance of previous Papal encyclicals on social justice that struck a
balance between the extremes of socialism on one hand and a total free market
on the other. This encyclical, in my reading
of it at least, leans much more heavily on the side of government regulation to
solve problems rather than the free market.
So, those are my thoughts. In three short posts, I cannot do this lengthy
encyclical complete justice, but I hope I have given you all a fair taste of
what is in there, both the good, and the controversial. I hope not only these three posts, but this
entire series, has given you a better appreciation for the Church as a great
promoter and believer in science, while recognizing that it (science) serves a
larger purpose, and that is the physical and moral development of man. Part of man’s responsibility and growth is
being a good steward of the Earth.
Nature, while distinct from God, is a great gift of God that demands our
gratitude and respect, in addition to our good stewardship.
I thank you for joining me for
this series. I welcome any comments on any
topic that was brought up in this series, or in any of my blog posts. I will
close this post and series with this prayer which was composed by Pope Francis,
and are the last words of Laudato Si (Praise be to you!)
Father, we
praise you with all your creatures.
They came forth from your all-powerful hand;
they are yours, filled with your presence and your tender love.
Praise be to you!
Son of God,
Jesus,
through you all things were made.
You were formed in the womb of Mary our Mother,
you became part of this earth,
and you gazed upon this world with human eyes.
Today you are alive in every creature
in your risen glory.
Praise be to you!
Holy Spirit,
by your light
you guide this world towards the Father’s love
and accompany creation as it groans in travail.
You also dwell in our hearts
and you inspire us to do what is good.
Praise be to you!
Triune Lord,
wondrous community of infinite love,
teach us to contemplate you
in the beauty of the universe,
for all things speak of you.
Awaken our praise and thankfulness
for every being that you have made.
Give us the grace to feel profoundly joined
to everything that is.
God of love,
show us our place in this world
as channels of your love
for all the creatures of this earth,
for not one of them is forgotten in your sight.
Enlighten those who possess power and money
that they may avoid the sin of indifference,
that they may love the common good, advance the weak,
and care for this world in which we live.
The poor and the earth are crying out.
O Lord, seize us with your power and light,
help us to protect all life,
to prepare for a better future,
for the coming of your Kingdom
of justice, peace, love and beauty.
Praise be to you!
Amen.
Saint Joseph, pray for us.